Skyhigh Security vs Cato Networks -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared

Skyhigh Security vs Cato Networks

Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cato Networks single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Cato Networks if true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions is your priority and mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.

Used Skyhigh Security or Cato Networks? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureCato NetworksSkyhigh Security
PricingCustom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiersCustom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth
Pricing ModelPer-user annual subscriptionPer-site and per-user annual subscription
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloudCloud
Best ForData-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking featuresMid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management
Single-pass cloud engine for all secu...Not availableSupported
Integrated SD-WAN with optimized routingNot availableSupported
Managed threat detection and response...Not availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Cato Networks when:

  • +You value industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
  • +You value advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
  • +You value strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
  • +You want to avoid smaller PoP footprint than Zscaler and Cloudflare (80+ vs 150+/300+)
  • +You want to avoid less mature CASB and DLP compared to Netskope and Zscaler

Choose Skyhigh Security when:

  • +You value true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions
  • +You value private global backbone provides predictable, SLA-backed performance
  • +You value simplest management experience with a single unified console
  • +You want to avoid brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
  • +You want to avoid sWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cato Networks

Pros

  • +True single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions
  • +Private global backbone provides predictable, SLA-backed performance
  • +Simplest management experience with a single unified console
  • +Very fast SASE deployment — sites can be onboarded in minutes
  • +Integrated SD-WAN eliminates the need for separate networking vendors

Cons

  • Smaller PoP footprint than Zscaler and Cloudflare (80+ vs 150+/300+)
  • Less mature CASB and DLP compared to Netskope and Zscaler
  • Fewer integrations with third-party security tools
  • Less proven at the largest enterprise scale (100,000+ users)
  • Private backbone adds cost compared to internet-based SASE

Skyhigh Security

Pros

  • +Industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
  • +Advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
  • +Strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
  • +Extensive API integrations with major SaaS platforms for out-of-band security
  • +Cloud Registry provides unmatched visibility into Shadow IT risk

Cons

  • Brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
  • SWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors
  • Smaller global network footprint than Zscaler, Cloudflare, and Netskope
  • No native SD-WAN capability — SSE focused rather than full SASE
  • Management experience can feel disjointed from McAfee-era product integration

Sources & References

  1. Cato Networks — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Skyhigh Security — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Cato Networks Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Skyhigh Security Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Cato Networks Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Skyhigh Security Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Cato Networks Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Skyhigh Security Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Single-Vendor SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. Forrester Wave: Zero Trust Network Access, Q3 2023[Analyst Report]
  12. IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
  13. CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model[Government Standard]
  14. Gartner Peer Insights: SSE[Peer Reviews]

Skyhigh Security vs Cato Networks FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Skyhigh Security and Cato Networks.

What is the main difference between Skyhigh Security and Cato Networks?

Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cato Networks single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Cato Networks better than Skyhigh Security?

Choose Cato Networks if true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions is your priority and mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.

How much does Cato Networks cost compared to Skyhigh Security?

Cato Networks pricing: Custom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth. Skyhigh Security pricing: Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers. Cato Networks's pricing model is per-site and per-user annual subscription, while Skyhigh Security uses per-user annual subscription pricing.

Can I migrate from Skyhigh Security to Cato Networks?

Yes, you can migrate from Skyhigh Security to Cato Networks. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.