Cato Networks vs Skyhigh Security -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared
Cato Networks vs Skyhigh Security
Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cato Networks single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Cato Networks if true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions is your priority and mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.
Used Cato Networks or Skyhigh Security? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Skyhigh Security | Cato Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers | Custom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth |
| Pricing Model | Per-user annual subscription | Per-site and per-user annual subscription |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Best For | Data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features | Mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management |
| Single-pass cloud engine for all secu... | Not available | Supported |
| Integrated SD-WAN with optimized routing | Not available | Supported |
| Managed threat detection and response... | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Skyhigh Security when:
- +You value industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
- +You value advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
- +You value strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
- +You want to avoid smaller PoP footprint than Zscaler and Cloudflare (80+ vs 150+/300+)
- +You want to avoid less mature CASB and DLP compared to Netskope and Zscaler
Choose Cato Networks when:
- +You value true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions
- +You value private global backbone provides predictable, SLA-backed performance
- +You value simplest management experience with a single unified console
- +You want to avoid brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
- +You want to avoid sWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors
Other Cato Networks Alternatives
Cloud-native SASE and zero trust platform for secure internet and private application access
Cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility
Developer-friendly zero trust platform built on Cloudflare's global Anycast network
Enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security
Converged SASE platform powered by FortiOS with competitive pricing and integrated SD-WAN
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
Cloud-native zero trust platform with FedRAMP authorization and competitive mid-market pricing
Pros & Cons Comparison
Skyhigh Security
Pros
- +Industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
- +Advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
- +Strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
- +Extensive API integrations with major SaaS platforms for out-of-band security
- +Cloud Registry provides unmatched visibility into Shadow IT risk
Cons
- –Brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
- –SWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors
- –Smaller global network footprint than Zscaler, Cloudflare, and Netskope
- –No native SD-WAN capability — SSE focused rather than full SASE
- –Management experience can feel disjointed from McAfee-era product integration
Cato Networks
Pros
- +True single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions
- +Private global backbone provides predictable, SLA-backed performance
- +Simplest management experience with a single unified console
- +Very fast SASE deployment — sites can be onboarded in minutes
- +Integrated SD-WAN eliminates the need for separate networking vendors
Cons
- –Smaller PoP footprint than Zscaler and Cloudflare (80+ vs 150+/300+)
- –Less mature CASB and DLP compared to Netskope and Zscaler
- –Fewer integrations with third-party security tools
- –Less proven at the largest enterprise scale (100,000+ users)
- –Private backbone adds cost compared to internet-based SASE
Sources & References
- Cato Networks — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Skyhigh Security — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Cato Networks Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Cato Networks Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Cato Networks Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Single-Vendor SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Zero Trust Network Access, Q3 2023[Analyst Report]
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model[Government Standard]
- Gartner Peer Insights: SSE[Peer Reviews]
Cato Networks vs Skyhigh Security FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security.
What is the main difference between Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security?
Cato Networks and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cato Networks single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Skyhigh Security better than Cato Networks?
Choose Cato Networks if true single-vendor SASE built from scratch — not assembled from acquisitions is your priority and mid-market and large enterprises wanting a true single-vendor SASE platform with a private global backbone and simplified management. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.
How much does Skyhigh Security cost compared to Cato Networks?
Skyhigh Security pricing: Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers. Cato Networks pricing: Custom pricing based on sites, users, and bandwidth. Skyhigh Security's pricing model is per-user annual subscription, while Cato Networks uses per-site and per-user annual subscription pricing.
Can I migrate from Cato Networks to Skyhigh Security?
Yes, you can migrate from Cato Networks to Skyhigh Security. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Skyhigh Security Alternatives
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonCisco Secure Access vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
ComparisonCloudflare Zero Trust vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
Comparisoniboss vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
ComparisonFortinet FortiSASE vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
ComparisonPalo Alto Prisma Access vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
ComparisonSkyhigh Security vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
ComparisonNetskope vs Cato Networks
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture