Skyhigh Security vs Palo Alto Prisma Access -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared
Skyhigh Security vs Palo Alto Prisma Access
Palo Alto Prisma Access and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Palo Alto Prisma Access enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access if seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers is your priority and enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.
Used Skyhigh Security or Palo Alto Prisma Access? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Palo Alto Prisma Access | Skyhigh Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers | Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-Mbps models |
| Pricing Model | Per-user annual subscription | Per-user or bandwidth-based annual subscription |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Best For | Data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features | Enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture |
| ZTNA 2.0 with continuous trust verifi... | Not available | Supported |
| Cloud-delivered next-gen firewall (FW... | Not available | Supported |
| Enterprise DLP with ML-based detection | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access when:
- +You value industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
- +You value advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
- +You value strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
- +You want to avoid most expensive SASE option with complex licensing and add-on costs
- +You want to avoid not truly cloud-native — evolved from on-prem firewall architecture
Choose Skyhigh Security when:
- +You value seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers
- +You value zTNA 2.0 provides continuous trust verification beyond initial authentication
- +You value comprehensive SASE stack with integrated SD-WAN (Prisma SD-WAN)
- +You want to avoid brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
- +You want to avoid sWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors
Other Skyhigh Security Alternatives
Cloud-native SASE and zero trust platform for secure internet and private application access
Cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility
Developer-friendly zero trust platform built on Cloudflare's global Anycast network
Converged SASE platform powered by FortiOS with competitive pricing and integrated SD-WAN
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
Cloud-native zero trust platform with FedRAMP authorization and competitive mid-market pricing
Pros & Cons Comparison
Palo Alto Prisma Access
Pros
- +Seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers
- +ZTNA 2.0 provides continuous trust verification beyond initial authentication
- +Comprehensive SASE stack with integrated SD-WAN (Prisma SD-WAN)
- +Strong threat prevention leveraging Palo Alto's Unit 42 threat intelligence
- +Unified management for on-prem firewalls and cloud-delivered security
Cons
- –Most expensive SASE option with complex licensing and add-on costs
- –Not truly cloud-native — evolved from on-prem firewall architecture
- –Management complexity with multiple consoles (Panorama, Strata Cloud Manager)
- –Less compelling for organizations without existing Palo Alto investment
- –SD-WAN acquired (CloudGenix) and still being fully integrated
Skyhigh Security
Pros
- +Industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database
- +Advanced DLP with OCR, exact data match, and ML-based classification
- +Strong in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare) with compliance-focused features
- +Extensive API integrations with major SaaS platforms for out-of-band security
- +Cloud Registry provides unmatched visibility into Shadow IT risk
Cons
- –Brand identity and product roadmap still stabilizing after McAfee separation
- –SWG and ZTNA capabilities are less mature than pure-play SASE vendors
- –Smaller global network footprint than Zscaler, Cloudflare, and Netskope
- –No native SD-WAN capability — SSE focused rather than full SASE
- –Management experience can feel disjointed from McAfee-era product integration
Sources & References
- Palo Alto Prisma Access — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Skyhigh Security — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Skyhigh Security Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Single-Vendor SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Zero Trust Network Access, Q3 2023[Analyst Report]
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model[Government Standard]
- Gartner Peer Insights: SSE[Peer Reviews]
Skyhigh Security vs Palo Alto Prisma Access FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Skyhigh Security and Palo Alto Prisma Access.
What is the main difference between Skyhigh Security and Palo Alto Prisma Access?
Palo Alto Prisma Access and Skyhigh Security are both sase & zero trust solutions. Palo Alto Prisma Access enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security, while Skyhigh Security data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Palo Alto Prisma Access better than Skyhigh Security?
Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access if seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers is your priority and enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture. Choose Skyhigh Security if industry-pioneering CASB with the deepest cloud service risk assessment database matters most and data-centric organizations in regulated industries that prioritize cloud data protection, CASB depth, and DLP over networking features.
How much does Palo Alto Prisma Access cost compared to Skyhigh Security?
Palo Alto Prisma Access pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-Mbps models. Skyhigh Security pricing: Custom pricing / Per-user subscription with feature tiers. Palo Alto Prisma Access's pricing model is per-user or bandwidth-based annual subscription, while Skyhigh Security uses per-user annual subscription pricing.
Can I migrate from Skyhigh Security to Palo Alto Prisma Access?
Yes, you can migrate from Skyhigh Security to Palo Alto Prisma Access. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Palo Alto Prisma Access Alternatives
Enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security
ComparisonCato Networks vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonCisco Secure Access vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonCloudflare Zero Trust vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
Comparisoniboss vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonFortinet FortiSASE vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonPalo Alto Prisma Access vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
ComparisonNetskope vs Skyhigh Security
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection