Cloud IAM · Head-to-Head

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity

Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. Microsoft Entra ID microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Microsoft Entra ID if included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops is your priority and organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.

Tried Microsoft Entra ID or Ping Identity? Drop a quick rating.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeaturePing IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID
PricingCustom enterprise pricing / PingOne Essential from $3/user/monthFree tier included with M365 / P1 from $6/user/month / P2 from $9/user/month
Pricing ModelPer-user subscription with tiered packagesPer-user monthly subscription (tiered)
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud
Best ForLarge enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilitiesOrganizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem
Single sign-on for cloud and on-premi...Not availableSupported
Conditional access with risk-based po...Not availableSupported
Multi-factor authentication with pass...Not availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Ping Identity when:

  • +You value extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options
  • +You value handles complex enterprise federation scenarios that simpler platforms cannot
  • +You value strong API security capabilities beyond basic identity management
  • +You want to avoid best experience limited to Microsoft ecosystem applications
  • +You want to avoid non-Microsoft application integrations can be less polished than Okta

Choose Microsoft Entra ID when:

  • +You value included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops
  • +You value deep native integration with Azure, M365, and Defender ecosystem
  • +You value conditional access policies are among the most powerful in the industry
  • +You want to avoid product portfolio complexity — many separate products with overlapping capabilities
  • +You want to avoid steeper learning curve than cloud-native platforms like Okta

Pros & Cons Comparison

Ping Identity

Pros

  • +Extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options
  • +Handles complex enterprise federation scenarios that simpler platforms cannot
  • +Strong API security capabilities beyond basic identity management
  • +Combined Ping + ForgeRock portfolio covers the widest range of identity use cases
  • +High-performance directory handles massive-scale CIAM deployments

Cons

  • Product portfolio complexity — many separate products with overlapping capabilities
  • Steeper learning curve than cloud-native platforms like Okta
  • Integration and deployment require more professional services investment
  • Ongoing Ping/ForgeRock merger creates product roadmap uncertainty
  • Cloud-native experience lags behind Okta and Entra ID for simpler use cases

Microsoft Entra ID

Pros

  • +Included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops
  • +Deep native integration with Azure, M365, and Defender ecosystem
  • +Conditional access policies are among the most powerful in the industry
  • +Passwordless authentication with Windows Hello and FIDO2 support
  • +Massive scale — proven across billions of authentications daily

Cons

  • Best experience limited to Microsoft ecosystem applications
  • Non-Microsoft application integrations can be less polished than Okta
  • Admin portal complexity — settings spread across multiple Azure portals
  • Identity Governance features require expensive P2 licensing
  • Hybrid identity (AD Connect) adds significant complexity

Sources & References

  1. Microsoft Entra ID — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Ping Identity — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Ping Identity Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Ping Identity Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Ping Identity Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity FAQ

Quick answers for teams evaluating Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity.

What is the main difference between Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity?

Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. Microsoft Entra ID microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Ping Identity better than Microsoft Entra ID?

Choose Microsoft Entra ID if included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops is your priority and organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.

How much does Ping Identity cost compared to Microsoft Entra ID?

Ping Identity starts at Custom enterprise pricing / PingOne Essential from $3/user/month (per-user subscription with tiered packages). Microsoft Entra ID starts at Free tier included with M365 / P1 from $6/user/month / P2 from $9/user/month (per-user monthly subscription (tiered)). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.

Can I migrate from Microsoft Entra ID to Ping Identity?

It depends on how deeply Microsoft Entra ID is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether Ping Identity supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.