Keycloak vs Auth0 -- Open Source IAM Compared
Keycloak vs Auth0
Auth0 and Keycloak are both developer identity / ciam solutions. Auth0 developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM, while Keycloak open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Auth0 if best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs is your priority and development teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences. Choose Keycloak if completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count matters most and organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs.
Used Keycloak or Auth0? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Auth0 | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open source) / Red Hat SSO for enterprise support | Free (up to 25,000 MAU) / Essential from $35/month / Professional from $240/month / Enterprise custom |
| Pricing Model | Free open source with optional commercial support | Monthly active user (MAU) based pricing |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-Hosted | Cloud |
| Best For | Organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs | Development teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences |
| Universal Login with customizable aut... | Not available | Supported |
| Passwordless authentication (email, S... | Not available | Supported |
| Actions — serverless extensibility fo... | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Auth0 when:
- +You value completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count
- +You value full source code access enables deep customization
- +You value self-hosted deployment gives complete data sovereignty
- +You want to avoid pricing escalates rapidly as monthly active users grow beyond free tier
- +You want to avoid now owned by Okta — long-term product independence uncertain
Choose Keycloak when:
- +You value best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs
- +You value generous free tier — 25,000 monthly active users at no cost
- +You value actions extensibility enables custom logic without managing infrastructure
- +You want to avoid requires significant engineering effort to deploy, scale, and maintain
- +You want to avoid no managed cloud service — you own all infrastructure operations
Other Keycloak Alternatives
Cloud identity and access management platform for SSO, MFA, and lifecycle management
Microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration
Enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security
Cloud IAM platform with SmartFactor Authentication and cost-effective pricing
Open directory platform unifying identity, device management, and access in one console
Cisco's MFA and zero trust access platform known for ease of deployment
Enterprise identity platform with AI-driven orchestration for complex deployments
Pros & Cons Comparison
Auth0
Pros
- +Best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs
- +Generous free tier — 25,000 monthly active users at no cost
- +Actions extensibility enables custom logic without managing infrastructure
- +Very fast integration path for adding authentication to applications
- +Extensive documentation and developer community
Cons
- –Pricing escalates rapidly as monthly active users grow beyond free tier
- –Now owned by Okta — long-term product independence uncertain
- –Workforce identity and enterprise SSO capabilities less mature than Okta
- –Enterprise plan required for advanced features like custom domains and SLAs
- –Management API rate limits can constrain high-throughput automation
Keycloak
Pros
- +Completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count
- +Full source code access enables deep customization
- +Self-hosted deployment gives complete data sovereignty
- +Red Hat backing provides commercial support option (Red Hat SSO)
- +Active community with extensive documentation and extensions
Cons
- –Requires significant engineering effort to deploy, scale, and maintain
- –No managed cloud service — you own all infrastructure operations
- –Pre-built SaaS application integrations far fewer than commercial platforms
- –User experience and admin UI less polished than Okta or Entra ID
- –High-availability and disaster recovery require complex infrastructure engineering
Sources & References
- Auth0 — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Keycloak — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Auth0 Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Keycloak Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Auth0 Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Keycloak Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Auth0 Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Keycloak Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]
Keycloak vs Auth0 FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Keycloak and Auth0.
What is the main difference between Keycloak and Auth0?
Auth0 and Keycloak are both developer identity / ciam solutions. Auth0 developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM, while Keycloak open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Auth0 better than Keycloak?
Choose Auth0 if best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs is your priority and development teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences. Choose Keycloak if completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count matters most and organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs.
How much does Auth0 cost compared to Keycloak?
Auth0 pricing: Free (up to 25,000 MAU) / Essential from $35/month / Professional from $240/month / Enterprise custom. Keycloak pricing: Free (open source) / Red Hat SSO for enterprise support. Auth0's pricing model is monthly active user (mau) based pricing, while Keycloak uses free open source with optional commercial support pricing.
Can I migrate from Keycloak to Auth0?
Yes, you can migrate from Keycloak to Auth0. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Auth0 Alternatives
Developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM
ComparisonAuth0 vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonJumpCloud vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonDuo Security vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonForgeRock vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonPing Identity vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonMicrosoft Entra ID vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization
ComparisonOkta vs Keycloak
Open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization