Identity & Access Management · Head-to-Head

Auth0 vs Keycloak

Auth0 and Keycloak are both developer identity / ciam solutions. Auth0 developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM, while Keycloak open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Auth0 if best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs is your priority and development teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences. Choose Keycloak if completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count matters most and organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs.

Tried Auth0 or Keycloak? Drop a quick rating.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureKeycloakAuth0
PricingFree (open source) / Red Hat SSO for enterprise supportFree (up to 25,000 MAU) / Essential from $35/month / Professional from $240/month / Enterprise custom
Pricing ModelFree open source with optional commercial supportMonthly active user (MAU) based pricing
Open SourceYesNo
DeploymentSelf-HostedCloud
Best ForOrganizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costsDevelopment teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences
Universal Login with customizable aut...Not availableSupported
Passwordless authentication (email, S...Not availableSupported
Actions — serverless extensibility fo...Not availableSupported
Compliance
SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001HIPAAGDPR

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Keycloak when:

  • +You value completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count
  • +You value full source code access enables deep customization
  • +You value self-hosted deployment gives complete data sovereignty
  • +You want to avoid pricing escalates rapidly as monthly active users grow beyond free tier
  • +You want to avoid now owned by Okta — long-term product independence uncertain

Choose Auth0 when:

  • +You value best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs
  • +You value generous free tier — 25,000 monthly active users at no cost
  • +You value actions extensibility enables custom logic without managing infrastructure
  • +You want to avoid requires significant engineering effort to deploy, scale, and maintain
  • +You want to avoid no managed cloud service — you own all infrastructure operations

Pros & Cons Comparison

Keycloak

Pros

  • +Free, fully open source, self-hosted forever
  • +Rich feature set comparable to commercial platforms
  • +Strong federation with LDAP and Active Directory
  • +Large community and extensive extension ecosystem

Cons

  • Operational overhead of running it yourself
  • Admin UI is functional but dated
  • Requires expertise to deploy for high availability
  • Upgrades between major versions can be painful

Auth0

Pros

  • +Excellent developer experience and documentation
  • +Generous free tier covers most early-stage apps
  • +Extensive SDKs for every major framework
  • +Actions and Rules allow flexible custom logic

Cons

  • Pricing gets expensive fast past the free tier
  • Okta acquisition raised long-term pricing concerns
  • B2B pricing tier jumps sharply for simple orgs support
  • Admin UI can feel dense for non-developer users

Sources & References

  1. Auth0 — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Keycloak — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Auth0 Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Keycloak Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Auth0 Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Keycloak Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Auth0 Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Keycloak Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]

Auth0 vs Keycloak FAQ

Quick answers for teams evaluating Auth0 vs Keycloak.

What is the main difference between Auth0 and Keycloak?

Auth0 and Keycloak are both developer identity / ciam solutions. Auth0 developer-first identity platform for customer authentication and CIAM, while Keycloak open-source IAM platform with SSO, identity brokering, and fine-grained authorization. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Keycloak better than Auth0?

Choose Auth0 if best developer experience in the identity industry with comprehensive SDKs is your priority and development teams building customer-facing applications that need flexible, API-first authentication with extensive SDK support and customizable login experiences. Choose Keycloak if completely free — no licensing costs regardless of user count matters most and organizations with engineering expertise that want full control over their identity platform, avoid vendor lock-in, and eliminate IAM licensing costs.

How much does Keycloak cost compared to Auth0?

Keycloak starts at Free (open source) / Red Hat Build of Keycloak via subscription (open source + enterprise subscription). Auth0 starts at Free up to 25,000 MAUs; B2C paid from $35/mo; B2B paid from $150/mo (per monthly active user (mau)). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.

Can I migrate from Auth0 to Keycloak?

It depends on how deeply Auth0 is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether Keycloak supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.