Identity & Access Management · Head-to-Head
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity
Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. Microsoft Entra ID microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops is your priority and organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.
Tried Microsoft Entra ID or Ping Identity? Drop a quick rating.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Ping Identity | Microsoft Entra ID |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing / PingOne Essential from $3/user/month | Free tier included with M365 / P1 from $6/user/month / P2 from $9/user/month |
| Pricing Model | Per-user subscription with tiered packages | Per-user monthly subscription (tiered) |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud |
| Best For | Large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities | Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem |
| Single sign-on for cloud and on-premi... | Not available | Supported |
| Conditional access with risk-based po... | Not available | Supported |
| Multi-factor authentication with pass... | Not available | Supported |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001FedRAMP HighHIPAA | SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001FedRAMP HighHIPAA |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Ping Identity when:
- +You value extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options
- +You value handles complex enterprise federation scenarios that simpler platforms cannot
- +You value strong API security capabilities beyond basic identity management
- +You want to avoid best experience limited to Microsoft ecosystem applications
- +You want to avoid non-Microsoft application integrations can be less polished than Okta
Choose Microsoft Entra ID when:
- +You value included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops
- +You value deep native integration with Azure, M365, and Defender ecosystem
- +You value conditional access policies are among the most powerful in the industry
- +You want to avoid product portfolio complexity — many separate products with overlapping capabilities
- +You want to avoid steeper learning curve than cloud-native platforms like Okta
Other Microsoft Entra ID Alternatives
Pros & Cons Comparison
Ping Identity
Pros
- +Mature platform with deep federation capabilities
- +Flexible deployment options (cloud, self-hosted, hybrid)
- +FedRAMP High authorization for government use
- +Unified workforce and customer identity after ForgeRock merger
Cons
- –Complex to configure and deploy
- –Pricing is enterprise-only (no published tiers)
- –Product lineup is confusing post-merger
- –Administrative UI is less polished than Okta's
Microsoft Entra ID
Pros
- +Included free or near-free with most Microsoft 365 plans
- +Deep integration across the Microsoft ecosystem
- +Strong conditional access and identity protection
- +Massive deployment base and long-term stability
Cons
- –Less polished for non-Microsoft SaaS integrations
- –Licensing complexity (P1 vs P2, add-ons, bundled skus)
- –Admin UI is fragmented across multiple Azure portals
- –Ties you deeper into the Microsoft ecosystem
Sources & References
- Microsoft Entra ID — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Ping Identity — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Ping Identity Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity FAQ
Quick answers for teams evaluating Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity.
What is the main difference between Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity?
Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity are both cloud iam solutions. Microsoft Entra ID microsoft's cloud identity platform with deep M365 and Azure integration, while Ping Identity enterprise identity security platform with flexible deployment and API security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Ping Identity better than Microsoft Entra ID?
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if included in Microsoft 365 licensing — significant cost savings for M365 shops is your priority and organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and Azure that want unified identity management across their Microsoft ecosystem. Choose Ping Identity if extremely flexible deployment — cloud, hybrid, and fully on-premises options matters most and large enterprises needing flexible deployment options, complex federation, and API security alongside traditional IAM capabilities.
How much does Ping Identity cost compared to Microsoft Entra ID?
Ping Identity starts at Contact sales (typical enterprise deployments from $50k/year) (enterprise (contact sales)). Microsoft Entra ID starts at Free tier with M365; P1 $6/user/mo; P2 $9/user/mo (per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses)). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.
Can I migrate from Microsoft Entra ID to Ping Identity?
It depends on how deeply Microsoft Entra ID is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether Ping Identity supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Ping Identity Alternatives
Enterprise-grade IAM with hybrid deployment and strong federation
ComparisonAuth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonKeycloak vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonJumpCloud vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonDuo Security vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonForgeRock vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonOneLogin vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
ComparisonOkta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure