Teleport vs CyberArk Privilege Cloud -- Privileged Access Management Compared

Teleport vs CyberArk Privilege Cloud (2026)

Teleport and CyberArk Privilege Cloud are both privileged access management solutions that serve different segments of the market. Teleport is cloud-hosted and self-hosted with open source + per-user tiers pricing and is best suited for devops and sre teams replacing bastion hosts, vpns, and shared ssh keys. CyberArk Privilege Cloud offers cloud-hosted with enterprise (contact sales) pricing and targets large enterprises and government agencies with complex legacy environments and compliance requirements.

Last updated

The Verdict

Teleport has an advantage for budget-conscious teams as an open-source option, while CyberArk Privilege Cloud is a commercial product with enterprise (contact sales) pricing. Teleport supports self-hosted deployment for organizations that need full infrastructure control, whereas CyberArk Privilege Cloud is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.

Tried Teleport or CyberArk Privilege Cloud? Drop a quick rating.

Teleport vs CyberArk Privilege Cloud at a Glance

TeleportCyberArk Privilege Cloud
CategoryPrivileged Access ManagementPrivileged Access Management
PricingCommunity Edition free; Team from $15/user/mo; Enterprise customContact sales (enterprise deployments typically $100k+ annually)
Pricing ModelOpen Source + Per-user tiersEnterprise (contact sales)
Open SourceYesNo
Cloud HostedYesYes
Self-HostedYesNo
Founded20151999
Rating4.6/54.2/5

Feature Comparison

Key capabilities of Teleport and CyberArk Privilege Cloud compared side by side.

Teleport

  • +Identity-aware proxy for SSH, Kubernetes, databases, web apps
  • +Short-lived certificates tied to SSO (SAML, OIDC, AD)
  • +Session recording and replay
  • +Just-in-time access requests and approvals
  • +RBAC with Kubernetes-native role definitions
  • +Device trust with TPM-backed hardware keys
  • +Headless authentication for CI/CD and machine workloads
  • +Access Monitoring dashboards and anomaly detection
  • +Passwordless auth with WebAuthn and biometrics
  • +Self-hosted or cloud-hosted deployment

CyberArk Privilege Cloud

  • +Privileged credential vault with automatic rotation
  • +Privileged session management with recording and live monitoring
  • +Just-in-time access with risk-based approval
  • +Threat analytics and behavioral anomaly detection
  • +Endpoint Privilege Manager for local admin rights
  • +Secrets Manager for DevOps and cloud workloads
  • +Integration with 400+ enterprise systems (mainframes, databases, network)
  • +FedRAMP High authorized
  • +Dynamic Access Provisioning for cloud infrastructure
  • +Identity Security Platform integration

Key Differentiators

Unique to Teleport

  • Short-lived certificates tied to SSO (SAML, OIDC, AD)
  • RBAC with Kubernetes-native role definitions
  • Device trust with TPM-backed hardware keys
  • Passwordless auth with WebAuthn and biometrics

Unique to CyberArk Privilege Cloud

  • Privileged credential vault with automatic rotation
  • Endpoint Privilege Manager for local admin rights
  • FedRAMP High authorized
  • Identity Security Platform integration

When to Choose Each

Choose Teleport if...

  • You need a tool best suited for devops and sre teams replacing bastion hosts, vpns, and shared ssh keys
  • You want an open-source solution with full code transparency
  • You require self-hosted deployment for data sovereignty
  • Open Source + Per-user tiers pricing fits your budget model

Choose CyberArk Privilege Cloud if...

  • You need a tool best suited for large enterprises and government agencies with complex legacy environments and compliance requirements
  • Enterprise (contact sales) pricing fits your budget model

Compliance & Certifications

Teleport

SOC 2 Type 2FedRAMP ModerateISO 27001

CyberArk Privilege Cloud

SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001FedRAMP HighHIPAAPCI-DSS

Also Worth Considering: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

Why SplitSecure? Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted

Pros & Cons Comparison

CyberArk Privilege Cloud

Pros

  • +Category leader in analyst reports (Gartner MQ Leader for years)
  • +Broadest coverage of legacy enterprise systems
  • +FedRAMP High makes it the default for US federal agencies
  • +Strong threat analytics and behavioral monitoring

Cons

  • Expensive; enterprise-only pricing with long sales cycles
  • Administrative complexity; steep operational learning curve
  • UI feels dated compared to modern DevOps PAM tools
  • Implementation typically requires professional services engagement

Teleport

Pros

  • +Excellent developer experience; cloud-native design
  • +Open source core with strong enterprise tier
  • +Short-lived certs eliminate shared credentials and password sprawl
  • +Broad protocol support (SSH, K8s, DB, apps) in one tool

Cons

  • Enterprise features require the paid tier
  • Complex to operate at scale without dedicated SREs
  • Self-hosted HA setup requires Postgres/etcd expertise
  • Smaller integration catalog than legacy PAM vendors

Sources & References

  1. Teleport (Official Site)[Vendor]
  2. Teleport Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  3. Teleport Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  4. Teleport Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  5. CyberArk Privilege Cloud (Official Site)[Vendor]
  6. CyberArk Privilege Cloud Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  7. CyberArk Privilege Cloud Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  8. CyberArk Privilege Cloud Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]

Teleport vs CyberArk Privilege Cloud FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Teleport and CyberArk Privilege Cloud.

What is the main difference between Teleport and CyberArk Privilege Cloud?

Teleport and CyberArk Privilege Cloud are both privileged access management solutions that serve different segments of the market. Teleport is cloud-hosted and self-hosted with open source + per-user tiers pricing and is best suited for devops and sre teams replacing bastion hosts, vpns, and shared ssh keys. CyberArk Privilege Cloud offers cloud-hosted with enterprise (contact sales) pricing and targets large enterprises and government agencies with complex legacy environments and compliance requirements.

Is CyberArk Privilege Cloud a good alternative to Teleport?

Teleport has an advantage for budget-conscious teams as an open-source option, while CyberArk Privilege Cloud is a commercial product with enterprise (contact sales) pricing. Teleport supports self-hosted deployment for organizations that need full infrastructure control, whereas CyberArk Privilege Cloud is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.

How does CyberArk Privilege Cloud pricing compare to Teleport?

Teleport pricing: Community Edition free; Team from $15/user/mo; Enterprise custom (open source + per-user tiers). CyberArk Privilege Cloud pricing: Contact sales (enterprise deployments typically $100k+ annually) (enterprise (contact sales)). The best option depends on your team size, usage patterns, and whether you need cloud-hosted, self-hosted, or hybrid deployment.

Can I migrate from Teleport to CyberArk Privilege Cloud?

Migration from Teleport to CyberArk Privilege Cloud is possible and depends on your specific setup. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate data migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during transition to ensure continuity. Check each vendor's migration documentation for specific guidance.