ManageEngine PAM360 vs Teleport -- PAM & Identity Compared

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Teleport

ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport are both pam & identity solutions. ManageEngine PAM360 affordable full-featured privileged access management solution, while Teleport open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 if significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions is your priority and mid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point. Choose Teleport if open-source with transparent security model matters most and engineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure access.

Used ManageEngine PAM360 or Teleport? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureTeleportManageEngine PAM360
PricingFree (Community) / From $20/resource/month (Enterprise)From $7,995/year (2 admins)
Pricing ModelPer-resource subscriptionPer-admin annual license
Open SourceYesNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForEngineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure accessMid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point
Privileged password vaultingNot availableSupported
Privileged session monitoring and rec...Not availableSupported
SSL certificate managementNot availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Teleport when:

  • +You value open-source with transparent security model
  • +You value modern, developer-friendly experience
  • +You value no standing credentials or VPNs required
  • +You want to avoid less scalable for very large enterprises
  • +You want to avoid limited advanced analytics and threat detection

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 when:

  • +You value significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions
  • +You value straightforward deployment and management
  • +You value good feature coverage for the price point
  • +You want to avoid less mature in traditional PAM use cases
  • +You want to avoid smaller enterprise feature set than CyberArk

Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted

Pros & Cons Comparison

Teleport

Pros

  • +Open-source with transparent security model
  • +Modern, developer-friendly experience
  • +No standing credentials or VPNs required
  • +Strong Kubernetes and cloud-native support
  • +Fast deployment and time-to-value

Cons

  • Less mature in traditional PAM use cases
  • Smaller enterprise feature set than CyberArk
  • Limited identity governance capabilities
  • Community edition has feature limitations

ManageEngine PAM360

Pros

  • +Significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions
  • +Straightforward deployment and management
  • +Good feature coverage for the price point
  • +Part of the ManageEngine IT management ecosystem

Cons

  • Less scalable for very large enterprises
  • Limited advanced analytics and threat detection
  • Fewer cloud-native capabilities
  • Smaller partner and integration ecosystem

Sources & References

  1. ManageEngine PAM360 — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Teleport — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Teleport Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Teleport Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. ManageEngine PAM360 Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Teleport Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Privileged Identity Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
  11. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: PAM 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Gartner Peer Insights: PAM[Peer Reviews]

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Teleport FAQ

Common questions about choosing between ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport.

What is the main difference between ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport?

ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport are both pam & identity solutions. ManageEngine PAM360 affordable full-featured privileged access management solution, while Teleport open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Teleport better than ManageEngine PAM360?

Choose ManageEngine PAM360 if significantly lower cost than enterprise PAM solutions is your priority and mid-market organizations needing capable PAM at a lower price point. Choose Teleport if open-source with transparent security model matters most and engineering teams needing modern, developer-friendly infrastructure access.

How much does Teleport cost compared to ManageEngine PAM360?

Teleport pricing: Free (Community) / From $20/resource/month (Enterprise). ManageEngine PAM360 pricing: From $7,995/year (2 admins). Teleport's pricing model is per-resource subscription, while ManageEngine PAM360 uses per-admin annual license pricing.

Can I migrate from ManageEngine PAM360 to Teleport?

Yes, you can migrate from ManageEngine PAM360 to Teleport. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.