Cisco Secure Access vs Palo Alto Prisma Access -- SASE & Zero Trust Compared
Cisco Secure Access vs Palo Alto Prisma Access
Cisco Secure Access and Palo Alto Prisma Access are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cisco Secure Access cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security, while Palo Alto Prisma Access enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Cisco Secure Access if cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team is your priority and large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform. Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access if seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers matters most and enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture.
Used Cisco Secure Access or Palo Alto Prisma Access? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Palo Alto Prisma Access | Cisco Secure Access |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-Mbps models | Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user bundled subscription |
| Pricing Model | Per-user or bandwidth-based annual subscription | Per-user annual subscription with bundled tiers |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Best For | Enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture | Large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform |
| Umbrella DNS security and SWG | Not available | Supported |
| Duo zero trust access and MFA | Not available | Supported |
| Meraki SD-WAN integration | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access when:
- +You value seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers
- +You value zTNA 2.0 provides continuous trust verification beyond initial authentication
- +You value comprehensive SASE stack with integrated SD-WAN (Prisma SD-WAN)
- +You want to avoid platform still maturing — recently converged from separate Umbrella, Duo, and AnyConnect products
- +You want to avoid integration between acquired components can be inconsistent
Choose Cisco Secure Access when:
- +You value cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team
- +You value unified platform for organizations already invested in Cisco networking and security
- +You value duo provides the most established zero trust MFA and access solution in the market
- +You want to avoid most expensive SASE option with complex licensing and add-on costs
- +You want to avoid not truly cloud-native — evolved from on-prem firewall architecture
Other Cisco Secure Access Alternatives
Cloud-native SASE and zero trust platform for secure internet and private application access
Cloud-native SASE platform with industry-leading CASB and granular SaaS visibility
Developer-friendly zero trust platform built on Cloudflare's global Anycast network
Converged SASE platform powered by FortiOS with competitive pricing and integrated SD-WAN
Single-vendor cloud-native SASE platform with private global backbone and converged architecture
Data-aware SSE platform with pioneering CASB technology and deep cloud data protection
Cloud-native zero trust platform with FedRAMP authorization and competitive mid-market pricing
Pros & Cons Comparison
Palo Alto Prisma Access
Pros
- +Seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers
- +ZTNA 2.0 provides continuous trust verification beyond initial authentication
- +Comprehensive SASE stack with integrated SD-WAN (Prisma SD-WAN)
- +Strong threat prevention leveraging Palo Alto's Unit 42 threat intelligence
- +Unified management for on-prem firewalls and cloud-delivered security
Cons
- –Most expensive SASE option with complex licensing and add-on costs
- –Not truly cloud-native — evolved from on-prem firewall architecture
- –Management complexity with multiple consoles (Panorama, Strata Cloud Manager)
- –Less compelling for organizations without existing Palo Alto investment
- –SD-WAN acquired (CloudGenix) and still being fully integrated
Cisco Secure Access
Pros
- +Cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team
- +Unified platform for organizations already invested in Cisco networking and security
- +Duo provides the most established zero trust MFA and access solution in the market
- +Meraki SD-WAN integration for branch office connectivity
- +ThousandEyes provides industry-leading digital experience monitoring
Cons
- –Platform still maturing — recently converged from separate Umbrella, Duo, and AnyConnect products
- –Integration between acquired components can be inconsistent
- –Cloud-native SASE capabilities lag behind Zscaler and Netskope
- –Complex licensing with multiple SKUs inherited from different product lines
- –Inline inspection and SSL decryption less performant than purpose-built cloud proxies
Sources & References
- Cisco Secure Access — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Cisco Secure Access Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Palo Alto Prisma Access Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Single-Vendor SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Zero Trust Network Access, Q3 2023[Analyst Report]
- IDC MarketScape: Worldwide SASE 2024[Analyst Report]
- CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model[Government Standard]
- Gartner Peer Insights: SSE[Peer Reviews]
Cisco Secure Access vs Palo Alto Prisma Access FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Cisco Secure Access and Palo Alto Prisma Access.
What is the main difference between Cisco Secure Access and Palo Alto Prisma Access?
Cisco Secure Access and Palo Alto Prisma Access are both sase & zero trust solutions. Cisco Secure Access cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security, while Palo Alto Prisma Access enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Palo Alto Prisma Access better than Cisco Secure Access?
Choose Cisco Secure Access if cisco Talos provides massive threat intelligence from the world's largest commercial security research team is your priority and large enterprises with existing Cisco networking infrastructure wanting to consolidate security into a unified SASE platform. Choose Palo Alto Prisma Access if seamless policy extension for existing Palo Alto NGFW customers matters most and enterprises already invested in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that want to extend their security policies to a cloud-delivered SASE architecture.
How much does Palo Alto Prisma Access cost compared to Cisco Secure Access?
Palo Alto Prisma Access pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user or per-Mbps models. Cisco Secure Access pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / Per-user bundled subscription. Palo Alto Prisma Access's pricing model is per-user or bandwidth-based annual subscription, while Cisco Secure Access uses per-user annual subscription with bundled tiers pricing.
Can I migrate from Cisco Secure Access to Palo Alto Prisma Access?
Yes, you can migrate from Cisco Secure Access to Palo Alto Prisma Access. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Palo Alto Prisma Access Alternatives
Enterprise SASE platform extending Palo Alto's next-gen firewall to cloud-delivered security
ComparisonCato Networks vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonCloudflare Zero Trust vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
Comparisoniboss vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonFortinet FortiSASE vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonPalo Alto Prisma Access vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonSkyhigh Security vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security
ComparisonNetskope vs Cisco Secure Access
Cisco's unified SASE platform converging Umbrella, Duo, and Meraki into cloud-delivered security