Enterprise Application Security · Head-to-Head

Checkmarx vs Veracode

Checkmarx and Veracode are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while Veracode cloud-based application security testing platform with SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose Veracode if binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access matters most and security teams managing application security across large application portfolios, especially when binary analysis of third-party or legacy applications is needed.

Tried Checkmarx or Veracode? Drop a quick rating.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureVeracodeCheckmarx
PricingCustom enterprise pricing (typically $30K+ annually)Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually)
Pricing ModelEnterprise license (application-based)Enterprise license (project/user-based)
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloudCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForSecurity teams managing application security across large application portfolios, especially when binary analysis of third-party or legacy applications is neededLarge enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance
Advanced SAST with deep dataflow anal...Not availableSupported
API security testingNot availableSupported
Supply chain security analysisNot availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Veracode when:

  • +You value binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access
  • +You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and pen testing
  • +You value strong application portfolio management and risk scoring
  • +You want to avoid significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
  • +You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration

Choose Checkmarx when:

  • +You value industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
  • +You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
  • +You value strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
  • +You want to avoid binary analysis requires compilation, slowing scan integration in CI/CD
  • +You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive compared to Snyk's workflow approach

Pros & Cons Comparison

Veracode

Pros

  • +Binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access
  • +Comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and pen testing
  • +Strong application portfolio management and risk scoring
  • +Developer security training integrated into the platform
  • +Proven track record with nearly two decades in the market

Cons

  • Binary analysis requires compilation, slowing scan integration in CI/CD
  • Developer experience is less intuitive compared to Snyk's workflow approach
  • Enterprise pricing is not transparent and requires sales engagement
  • Scan upload and processing times can be lengthy for large applications
  • SCA capabilities are less comprehensive than dedicated SCA tools like Snyk

Checkmarx

Pros

  • +Strong SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
  • +Comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
  • +Strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
  • +Custom query language allows tailored security rules for complex codebases
  • +Mature enterprise support with dedicated customer success

Cons

  • Significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
  • Developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration
  • Scan times can be slow for large codebases with deep analysis enabled
  • Steep learning curve for custom query configuration
  • Historically security-team focused rather than developer-first

Sources & References

  1. Checkmarx — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Veracode — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Checkmarx Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Veracode Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Checkmarx Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Veracode Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Checkmarx Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Veracode Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q3 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. Forrester Wave: Software Composition Analysis, Q2 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks[Industry Framework]
  13. NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)[Government Standard]
  14. Gartner Peer Insights: AST[Peer Reviews]

Checkmarx vs Veracode FAQ

Quick answers for teams evaluating Checkmarx vs Veracode.

What is the main difference between Checkmarx and Veracode?

Checkmarx and Veracode are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while Veracode cloud-based application security testing platform with SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Veracode better than Checkmarx?

Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose Veracode if binary-level SAST enables testing without source code access matters most and security teams managing application security across large application portfolios, especially when binary analysis of third-party or legacy applications is needed.

How much does Veracode cost compared to Checkmarx?

Veracode starts at Custom enterprise pricing (typically $30K+ annually) (enterprise license (application-based)). Checkmarx starts at Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually) (enterprise license (project/user-based)). As always, the sticker price only tells part of the story. Factor in add-ons, implementation costs, and what's actually included at each tier.

Can I migrate from Checkmarx to Veracode?

It depends on how deeply Checkmarx is embedded in your stack. Most teams run both in parallel for a few weeks before cutting over. Check whether Veracode supports importing your existing configs or policies. That's usually the biggest time sink.