GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx -- Developer Security Compared

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx

Checkmarx and GitHub Advanced Security are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while GitHub Advanced Security gitHub-native security scanning with CodeQL SAST, secret scanning, and Dependabot dependency management. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose GitHub Advanced Security if zero-friction integration for GitHub-native development teams matters most and development teams already using GitHub that want native, zero-friction security scanning integrated directly into their pull request workflow.

Used GitHub Advanced Security or Checkmarx? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureCheckmarxGitHub Advanced Security
PricingFree for public repos / $49/committer/month for GitHub EnterpriseCustom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually)
Pricing ModelPer-active-committer (monthly)Enterprise license (project/user-based)
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForDevelopment teams already using GitHub that want native, zero-friction security scanning integrated directly into their pull request workflowLarge enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance
Advanced SAST with deep dataflow anal...Not availableSupported
Software composition analysis with li...Not availableSupported
Dynamic application security testing ...Not availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Checkmarx when:

  • +You value zero-friction integration for GitHub-native development teams
  • +You value free for all public repositories including SAST and secret scanning
  • +You value codeQL provides deep semantic analysis with custom query capabilities
  • +You want to avoid significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
  • +You want to avoid developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration

Choose GitHub Advanced Security when:

  • +You value industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
  • +You value comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
  • +You value strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
  • +You want to avoid only available for GitHub repositories, creating platform lock-in
  • +You want to avoid no container image scanning beyond basic Dependabot alerts

Pros & Cons Comparison

Checkmarx

Pros

  • +Strong SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development
  • +Comprehensive platform covering SAST, SCA, DAST, and API security
  • +Strong compliance reporting and governance capabilities
  • +Custom query language allows tailored security rules for complex codebases
  • +Mature enterprise support with dedicated customer success

Cons

  • Significantly more expensive than Snyk with enterprise-only pricing
  • Developer experience is less intuitive than Snyk's workflow integration
  • Scan times can be slow for large codebases with deep analysis enabled
  • Steep learning curve for custom query configuration
  • Historically security-team focused rather than developer-first

GitHub Advanced Security

Pros

  • +Zero-friction integration for GitHub-native development teams
  • +Free for all public repositories including SAST and secret scanning
  • +CodeQL provides deep semantic analysis with custom query capabilities
  • +Secret scanning with push protection prevents credential leaks proactively
  • +Dependabot automates dependency updates with minimal configuration

Cons

  • Only available for GitHub repositories, creating platform lock-in
  • No container image scanning beyond basic Dependabot alerts
  • No IaC security scanning capabilities
  • Per-committer pricing can be expensive for organizations with many contributors
  • SCA capabilities are less comprehensive than Snyk's purpose-built analysis

Sources & References

  1. Checkmarx — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. GitHub Advanced Security — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Checkmarx Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. GitHub Advanced Security Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Checkmarx Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. GitHub Advanced Security Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Checkmarx Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. GitHub Advanced Security Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Static Application Security Testing, Q3 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. Forrester Wave: Software Composition Analysis, Q2 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks[Industry Framework]
  13. NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)[Government Standard]
  14. Gartner Peer Insights: AST[Peer Reviews]

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx FAQ

Common questions about choosing between GitHub Advanced Security and Checkmarx.

What is the main difference between GitHub Advanced Security and Checkmarx?

Checkmarx and GitHub Advanced Security are both enterprise application security solutions. Checkmarx enterprise application security platform with deep SAST, SCA, DAST, and supply chain security, while GitHub Advanced Security gitHub-native security scanning with CodeQL SAST, secret scanning, and Dependabot dependency management. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Checkmarx better than GitHub Advanced Security?

Choose Checkmarx if industry-leading SAST depth and accuracy from two decades of development is your priority and large enterprises that need comprehensive, compliance-driven application security testing with deep SAST accuracy and centralized security governance. Choose GitHub Advanced Security if zero-friction integration for GitHub-native development teams matters most and development teams already using GitHub that want native, zero-friction security scanning integrated directly into their pull request workflow.

How much does Checkmarx cost compared to GitHub Advanced Security?

Checkmarx pricing: Custom enterprise pricing (typically $50K+ annually). GitHub Advanced Security pricing: Free for public repos / $49/committer/month for GitHub Enterprise. Checkmarx's pricing model is enterprise license (project/user-based), while GitHub Advanced Security uses per-active-committer (monthly) pricing.

Can I migrate from GitHub Advanced Security to Checkmarx?

Yes, you can migrate from GitHub Advanced Security to Checkmarx. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.