Tessian vs Abnormal Security -- AI Email Security Compared
Tessian vs Abnormal Security
Abnormal Security and Tessian are both ai email security solutions. Abnormal Security aI-powered email security platform specializing in behavioral detection of social engineering attacks, while Tessian human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose Abnormal Security if superior detection of socially-engineered attacks with no malicious payload is your priority and organizations facing sophisticated social engineering and BEC attacks that bypass traditional email gateways. Choose Tessian if unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well matters most and organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error.
Used Tessian or Abnormal Security? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | Abnormal Security | Tessian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom pricing / per-user licensing | Custom pricing / per-user licensing |
| Pricing Model | Per-user subscription | Per-user subscription |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Best For | Organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error | Organizations facing sophisticated social engineering and BEC attacks that bypass traditional email gateways |
| Business email compromise prevention | Not available | Supported |
| Vendor and supply chain fraud detection | Not available | Supported |
| Automated remediation and quarantine | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose Abnormal Security when:
- +You value unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well
- +You value behavioral AI catches threats that gateway solutions miss
- +You value real-time coaching helps users make better security decisions
- +You want to avoid does not replace a full email gateway — typically layers on top of one
- +You want to avoid less effective against traditional malware and payload-based attacks
Choose Tessian when:
- +You value superior detection of socially-engineered attacks with no malicious payload
- +You value aPI-based deployment requires no MX record changes — deploys in minutes
- +You value behavioral AI catches novel attacks that signature-based tools miss
- +You want to avoid now part of Proofpoint — future as standalone product uncertain
- +You want to avoid not a full email gateway replacement
Other Tessian Alternatives
Enterprise email security platform for advanced threat protection, compliance, and data loss prevention
Cloud email security platform with threat protection, archiving, and continuity
Microsoft's native email security for Microsoft 365 with XDR integration
Email threat protection platform available as gateway appliance or cloud service
Enterprise email security gateway with Cisco Talos threat intelligence integration
Cloud email security gateway with AI-powered BEC detection and XDR integration
AI-powered anti-phishing platform with crowdsourced threat intelligence
Pros & Cons Comparison
Abnormal Security
Pros
- +Superior detection of socially-engineered attacks with no malicious payload
- +API-based deployment requires no MX record changes — deploys in minutes
- +Behavioral AI catches novel attacks that signature-based tools miss
- +Extremely low false positive rate due to identity-based detection
- +Strong vendor and supply chain fraud detection capabilities
Cons
- –Does not replace a full email gateway — typically layers on top of one
- –Less effective against traditional malware and payload-based attacks
- –Premium pricing for what is an additional security layer
- –Behavioral models need time to learn organization communication patterns
- –No email archiving, DLP, or compliance capabilities
Tessian
Pros
- +Unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well
- +Behavioral AI catches threats that gateway solutions miss
- +Real-time coaching helps users make better security decisions
- +Prevents both intentional exfiltration and accidental data loss
- +API-based deployment with no MX record changes required
Cons
- –Now part of Proofpoint — future as standalone product uncertain
- –Not a full email gateway replacement
- –Narrower threat coverage than comprehensive email security platforms
- –Behavioral models require learning period to reduce initial false positives
- –No email archiving or compliance capabilities
Sources & References
- Abnormal Security — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Tessian — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Abnormal Security Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Abnormal Security Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Abnormal Security Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Tessian Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Email Security 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Enterprise Email Security, Q2 2024[Analyst Report]
- SE Labs: Email Security Gateway Tests[Independent Testing]
- Anti-Phishing Working Group: Phishing Activity Trends[Industry Research]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Email Security[Peer Reviews]
Tessian vs Abnormal Security FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Tessian and Abnormal Security.
What is the main difference between Tessian and Abnormal Security?
Abnormal Security and Tessian are both ai email security solutions. Abnormal Security aI-powered email security platform specializing in behavioral detection of social engineering attacks, while Tessian human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is Abnormal Security better than Tessian?
Choose Abnormal Security if superior detection of socially-engineered attacks with no malicious payload is your priority and organizations facing sophisticated social engineering and BEC attacks that bypass traditional email gateways. Choose Tessian if unique misdirected email prevention addresses a gap no other tool covers well matters most and organizations concerned about both inbound email threats and accidental data loss from misdirected emails and human error.
How much does Abnormal Security cost compared to Tessian?
Abnormal Security pricing: Custom pricing / per-user licensing. Tessian pricing: Custom pricing / per-user licensing. Abnormal Security's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Tessian uses per-user subscription pricing.
Can I migrate from Tessian to Abnormal Security?
Yes, you can migrate from Tessian to Abnormal Security. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Abnormal Security Alternatives
AI-powered email security platform specializing in behavioral detection of social engineering attacks
ComparisonCisco Secure Email vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonAbnormal Security vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonBarracuda Email Security vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonIRONSCALES vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonMicrosoft Defender for Office 365 vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonProofpoint vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails
ComparisonMimecast vs Tessian
Human layer security platform preventing inbound threats and outbound misdirected emails