Pulumi ESC vs Infisical -- Secrets Management Compared

Pulumi ESC vs Infisical (2026)

Pulumi ESC (secrets management) and Infisical (open source) are cybersecurity tools that serve different segments of the market. Pulumi ESC is cloud-hosted with per-user tiers pricing and is best suited for teams using pulumi for iac who need a secrets layer that composes multiple backends. Infisical offers cloud-hosted and self-hosted with per-user pricing and targets teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.

Last updated

The Verdict

Infisical stands out as an open-source alternative, while Pulumi ESC follows a per-user tiers pricing model. Infisical offers self-hosted deployment for teams with strict data residency requirements, while Pulumi ESC is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.

Tried Pulumi ESC or Infisical? Drop a quick rating.

Pulumi ESC vs Infisical at a Glance

Pulumi ESCInfisical
CategorySecrets ManagementOpen Source
PricingFree tier; Team from $50/user/mo; Business from $90/user/moFree (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month
Pricing ModelPer-user tiersPer-user
Open SourceNoYes
Cloud HostedYesYes
Self-HostedNoYes
Founded20242022
Rating4.1/54.3/5

Feature Comparison

Key capabilities of Pulumi ESC and Infisical compared side by side.

Pulumi ESC

  • +Compose environments from multiple secret sources
  • +Providers for AWS, Azure, GCP, Vault, Doppler, 1Password, GitHub
  • +Environment variables, file, or SDK access modes
  • +Versioned environments with rollback
  • +Rotation schedules and OIDC-based auth
  • +Native integration with Pulumi IaC
  • +ESC CLI and REST API
  • +Works with non-Pulumi workflows (CI/CD, runtime apps)
  • +Audit logs and access policies
  • +RBAC with role-based environment access

Infisical

  • +End-to-end encryption
  • +Automatic secret rotation
  • +Environment-based management
  • +Native CI/CD integrations
  • +Secret versioning and rollback
  • +Kubernetes operator
  • +Point-in-time recovery
  • +Audit logs and compliance

Key Differentiators

Unique to Pulumi ESC

  • Providers for AWS, Azure, GCP, Vault, Doppler, 1Password, GitHub
  • Environment variables, file, or SDK access modes
  • ESC CLI and REST API
  • Works with non-Pulumi workflows (CI/CD, runtime apps)

Unique to Infisical

  • End-to-end encryption
  • Environment-based management
  • Kubernetes operator
  • Point-in-time recovery

When to Choose Each

Choose Pulumi ESC if...

  • →You need a tool best suited for teams using pulumi for iac who need a secrets layer that composes multiple backends
  • →Per-user tiers pricing fits your budget model

Choose Infisical if...

  • →You need a tool best suited for teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience
  • →You want an open-source solution with full code transparency
  • →You require self-hosted deployment for data sovereignty
  • →Per-user pricing fits your budget model

Compliance & Certifications

Pulumi ESC

SOC 2 Type 2

Infisical

No certifications listed

Also Worth Considering: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

Why SplitSecure? Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits secrets across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • –Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted
View Profile

Pros & Cons Comparison

Infisical

Pros

  • +Open-source and transparent
  • +Modern UI and developer experience
  • +Self-host or cloud option
  • +Active development and community
  • +Affordable per-user pricing

Cons

  • –Newer platform, less proven at scale
  • –Fewer integrations than Vault
  • –Enterprise features still maturing
  • –Smaller ecosystem

Pulumi ESC

Pros

  • +Sits cleanly on top of existing secrets stores — no migration needed
  • +Composition model makes multi-cloud environments simple
  • +Strong fit if you already use Pulumi for IaC
  • +OIDC-based auth eliminates static Pulumi tokens

Cons

  • –Newer product; smaller community than Doppler/Infisical
  • –Best value only realized if you adopt Pulumi IaC too
  • –Per-user pricing at the Team tier is steep
  • –No self-hosted option

Other Pulumi ESC Alternatives

Doppler logo
Doppler

Developer-first universal secrets management platform

HashiCorp Vault logo
HashiCorp Vault

Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform

External Secrets Operator logo
External Secrets Operator

K8s operator that syncs secrets from external stores into Kubernetes Secrets

Sources & References

  1. Pulumi ESC (Official Site)[Vendor]
  2. Pulumi ESC Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  3. Pulumi ESC Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  4. Pulumi ESC Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  5. Infisical (Official Site)[Vendor]
  6. Infisical Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  7. Infisical Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  8. Infisical Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Market Guide for Secrets Management[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Secrets Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
  11. GigaOm Radar for Key Management[Analyst Report]
  12. NIST SP 800-57: Recommendation for Key Management[Government Standard]
  13. CIS Controls: Safeguard 3.11 – Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest[Industry Framework]

Pulumi ESC vs Infisical FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Pulumi ESC and Infisical.

What is the main difference between Pulumi ESC and Infisical?

Pulumi ESC (secrets management) and Infisical (open source) are cybersecurity tools that serve different segments of the market. Pulumi ESC is cloud-hosted with per-user tiers pricing and is best suited for teams using pulumi for iac who need a secrets layer that composes multiple backends. Infisical offers cloud-hosted and self-hosted with per-user pricing and targets teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.

Is Infisical a good alternative to Pulumi ESC?

Infisical stands out as an open-source alternative, while Pulumi ESC follows a per-user tiers pricing model. Infisical offers self-hosted deployment for teams with strict data residency requirements, while Pulumi ESC is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.

How does Infisical pricing compare to Pulumi ESC?

Pulumi ESC pricing: Free tier; Team from $50/user/mo; Business from $90/user/mo (per-user tiers). Infisical pricing: Free (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month (per-user). The best option depends on your team size, usage patterns, and whether you need cloud-hosted, self-hosted, or hybrid deployment.

Can I migrate from Pulumi ESC to Infisical?

Migration from Pulumi ESC to Infisical is possible and depends on your specific setup. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate data migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during transition to ensure continuity. Check each vendor's migration documentation for specific guidance.

Related Comparisons & Guides

Product Hub

Infisical Alternatives

Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams

Comparison

Pulumi ESC vs Doppler

Developer-first universal secrets management platform

Comparison

Pulumi ESC vs HashiCorp Vault

Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform

Comparison

Pulumi ESC vs External Secrets Operator

K8s operator that syncs secrets from external stores into Kubernetes Secrets