Infisical vs CyberArk Conjur -- Open Source Compared
Infisical vs CyberArk Conjur
CyberArk Conjur and Infisical are both enterprise solutions. CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform, while Infisical open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Last updated
The Verdict
Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security is your priority and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements. Choose Infisical if open-source and transparent matters most and teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.
Used Infisical or CyberArk Conjur? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | CyberArk Conjur | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month | Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request |
| Pricing Model | Per-user | Enterprise license |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-Hosted | Cloud, Self-Hosted |
| Best For | Teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience | Large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements |
| Policy-as-code access control | Not available | Supported |
| Machine identity management | Not available | Supported |
| Centralized audit trail | Not available | Supported |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose CyberArk Conjur when:
- +You value open-source and transparent
- +You value modern UI and developer experience
- +You value self-host or cloud option
- +You want to avoid complex setup and configuration
- +You want to avoid enterprise pricing can be high
Choose Infisical when:
- +You value enterprise-grade security
- +You value open-source community edition
- +You value strong compliance support
- +You want to avoid newer platform, less proven at scale
- +You want to avoid fewer integrations than Vault
Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure
We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.
Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency
- +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
- +Secrets never leave your environment
- +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
- –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
- –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
- –Newer platform with smaller market presence
Other Infisical Alternatives
Secrets automation and password management for teams and CI/CD
Open-source enterprise password manager with self-hosting and transparent security
Zero-knowledge enterprise password and secrets management with dark web monitoring
Widely adopted enterprise password management with extensive SSO and MFA integration
Business password management with built-in VPN, phishing protection, and SSO integration
Industry-standard open-source secrets management platform
Developer-first universal secrets management platform
Pros & Cons Comparison
CyberArk Conjur
Pros
- +Enterprise-grade security
- +Open-source community edition
- +Strong compliance support
- +Deep DevOps toolchain integration
Cons
- –Complex setup and configuration
- –Enterprise pricing can be high
- –Steeper learning curve
- –Requires CyberArk ecosystem for full value
Infisical
Pros
- +Open-source and transparent
- +Modern UI and developer experience
- +Self-host or cloud option
- +Active development and community
- +Affordable per-user pricing
Cons
- –Newer platform, less proven at scale
- –Fewer integrations than Vault
- –Enterprise features still maturing
- –Smaller ecosystem
Sources & References
- CyberArk Conjur — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- Infisical — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Infisical Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Infisical Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- CyberArk Conjur Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Infisical Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
Infisical vs CyberArk Conjur FAQ
Common questions about choosing between Infisical and CyberArk Conjur.
What is the main difference between Infisical and CyberArk Conjur?
CyberArk Conjur and Infisical are both enterprise solutions. CyberArk Conjur enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform, while Infisical open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.
Is CyberArk Conjur better than Infisical?
Choose CyberArk Conjur if enterprise-grade security is your priority and large enterprises with complex compliance and PAM requirements. Choose Infisical if open-source and transparent matters most and teams wanting open-source with a modern developer experience.
How much does CyberArk Conjur cost compared to Infisical?
CyberArk Conjur pricing: Open source (Community) / Enterprise pricing on request. Infisical pricing: Free (self-hosted) / Cloud from $6/user/month. CyberArk Conjur's pricing model is enterprise license, while Infisical uses per-user pricing.
Can I migrate from Infisical to CyberArk Conjur?
Yes, you can migrate from Infisical to CyberArk Conjur. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
CyberArk Conjur Alternatives
Enterprise privileged access and secrets management platform
ComparisonCyberArk Conjur vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonDashlane (Business) vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonAWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonAzure Key Vault vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonBitwarden (Business) vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonGoogle Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams
ComparisonHashiCorp Vault vs Infisical
Open-source end-to-end encrypted secrets management for teams