Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless -- Cloud-Native Compared

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless

Google Cloud Secret Manager offers the simplest API and most generous free tier among cloud-native options. Akeyless provides multi-cloud support and additional features like secure remote access that GCP Secret Manager doesn't offer.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose GCP Secret Manager if you're running on Google Cloud and want the simplest, most cost-effective secrets management. Choose Akeyless if you need multi-cloud support or advanced features beyond basic secret storage.

Used Google Cloud Secret Manager or Akeyless? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureAkeylessGoogle Cloud Secret Manager
Cloud IntegrationDeep GCP-nativeMulti-cloud via gateways
PricingFree tier + $0.06/10k opsCustom pricing
Secret VersioningAutomatic, built-inVersion tracking
API SimplicityVery simple REST/gRPCREST API
Multi-CloudGCP onlyAWS, Azure, GCP
RotationBasic (Pub/Sub triggers)Built-in rotation engine
Secure Remote AccessNot availableBuilt-in SSH/RDP
EncryptionCMEK with Cloud KMSZero-knowledge DFC

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Akeyless when:

  • +You're running workloads primarily on GCP
  • +You want the simplest, most intuitive API
  • +You need a generous free tier to start
  • +You want automatic versioning built-in
  • +You prefer GCP's IAM model for access control

Choose Google Cloud Secret Manager when:

  • +You use multiple cloud providers
  • +You need advanced rotation beyond GCP services
  • +You want secure remote access features
  • +You need a richer feature set for enterprise use
  • +You want a single platform across all clouds

Recommended Alternative: SplitSecure

SplitSecure logoSplitSecure
Distributed Security

We recommend SplitSecure — Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency. Splits credentials across devices you control using Shamir Secret Sharing.

Best For

Highest-sensitivity accounts, regulated industries, and MSPs needing zero vendor dependency

Key Features
Shamir Secret Sharing across devicesZero vendor dependency architectureAutomatic audit trail generationNo vault infrastructure required+4 more
Pros
  • +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
  • +Secrets never leave your environment
  • +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
Cons
  • Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
  • Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
  • Newer platform with smaller market presence
Self-Hosted

Pros & Cons Comparison

Akeyless

Pros

  • +Zero-knowledge SaaS architecture
  • +No infrastructure to manage
  • +Built-in secure remote access
  • +Fast time-to-value and easy onboarding
  • +Multi-cloud out of the box

Cons

  • Proprietary and closed-source
  • Custom pricing lacks transparency
  • Smaller community than open-source tools
  • Vendor lock-in with proprietary DFC
  • Fewer third-party integrations than Vault

Google Cloud Secret Manager

Pros

  • +Simple and intuitive API
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Strong GCP integration
  • +Automatic versioning built-in

Cons

  • GCP lock-in
  • Fewer rotation features than AWS
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • No self-hosted option

Sources & References

  1. Akeyless — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Google Cloud Secret Manager — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Akeyless Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Akeyless Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Akeyless Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Google Cloud Secret Manager Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Market Guide for Secrets Management[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Secrets Management, Q4 2023[Analyst Report]
  11. NIST SP 800-57: Recommendation for Key Management[Government Standard]

Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Akeyless FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Google Cloud Secret Manager and Akeyless.

What is the main difference between Google Cloud Secret Manager and Akeyless?

Google Cloud Secret Manager offers the simplest API and most generous free tier among cloud-native options. Akeyless provides multi-cloud support and additional features like secure remote access that GCP Secret Manager doesn't offer.

Is Akeyless better than Google Cloud Secret Manager?

Choose GCP Secret Manager if you're running on Google Cloud and want the simplest, most cost-effective secrets management. Choose Akeyless if you need multi-cloud support or advanced features beyond basic secret storage.

How much does Akeyless cost compared to Google Cloud Secret Manager?

Akeyless pricing: Custom pricing / Free community tier. Google Cloud Secret Manager pricing: Free for 6 active versions + $0.06/10k access ops. Akeyless's pricing model is custom enterprise, while Google Cloud Secret Manager uses per-operation pricing.

Can I migrate from Google Cloud Secret Manager to Akeyless?

Yes, you can migrate from Google Cloud Secret Manager to Akeyless. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.