Forcepoint DLP vs Netwrix -- Enterprise DLP Compared

Forcepoint DLP vs Netwrix

Forcepoint DLP and Netwrix are both enterprise dlp solutions. Forcepoint DLP enterprise DLP platform with risk-adaptive protection and multi-channel data loss prevention, while Netwrix data security and auditing platform for change tracking, compliance, and user behavior monitoring. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Forcepoint DLP if comprehensive DLP coverage across all exfiltration channels is your priority and large enterprises needing comprehensive DLP enforcement across endpoints, network, cloud, and email with risk-adaptive policy controls. Choose Netwrix if more accessible pricing for mid-market organizations matters most and mid-market organizations needing data auditing, change tracking, and compliance reporting at a lower price point than enterprise platforms.

Used Forcepoint DLP or Netwrix? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureNetwrixForcepoint DLP
PricingFrom $25/user/year / Enterprise custom pricingCustom enterprise pricing based on user count
Pricing ModelPer-user subscriptionPer-user subscription
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForMid-market organizations needing data auditing, change tracking, and compliance reporting at a lower price point than enterprise platformsLarge enterprises needing comprehensive DLP enforcement across endpoints, network, cloud, and email with risk-adaptive policy controls
Multi-channel DLP across endpoint, ne...Not availableSupported
Risk-Adaptive Protection based on use...Not availableSupported
OCR and image content analysisNot availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Netwrix when:

  • +You value more accessible pricing for mid-market organizations
  • +You value strong change auditing across hybrid environments
  • +You value straightforward deployment compared to enterprise platforms
  • +You want to avoid complex deployment and ongoing policy management
  • +You want to avoid does not provide data access governance or permission analysis

Choose Forcepoint DLP when:

  • +You value comprehensive DLP coverage across all exfiltration channels
  • +You value risk-Adaptive Protection adjusts enforcement based on user risk level
  • +You value 1,700+ pre-built classifiers for sensitive data identification
  • +You want to avoid less sophisticated behavioral analytics than Varonis UEBA
  • +You want to avoid data classification capabilities less mature than dedicated platforms

Pros & Cons Comparison

Netwrix

Pros

  • +More accessible pricing for mid-market organizations
  • +Strong change auditing across hybrid environments
  • +Straightforward deployment compared to enterprise platforms
  • +Good Active Directory auditing and security capabilities
  • +Broad platform coverage including cloud and on-premises

Cons

  • Less sophisticated behavioral analytics than Varonis UEBA
  • Data classification capabilities less mature than dedicated platforms
  • Limited automated remediation for overexposed data
  • Reporting capabilities less customizable than enterprise competitors
  • Cloud-native monitoring coverage still expanding

Forcepoint DLP

Pros

  • +Comprehensive DLP coverage across all exfiltration channels
  • +Risk-Adaptive Protection adjusts enforcement based on user risk level
  • +1,700+ pre-built classifiers for sensitive data identification
  • +Strong incident management and remediation workflows
  • +Long track record in enterprise DLP deployments

Cons

  • Complex deployment and ongoing policy management
  • Does not provide data access governance or permission analysis
  • Endpoint agent can impact system performance
  • Licensing costs are significant for large user populations
  • Legacy architecture in some components can feel dated

Sources & References

  1. Forcepoint DLP — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Netwrix — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Forcepoint DLP Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Netwrix Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Forcepoint DLP Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Netwrix Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Forcepoint DLP Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Netwrix Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Market Guide for Data Loss Prevention 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Data Security Platforms, Q1 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Data Security Platforms 2024[Analyst Report]
  12. Gartner Peer Insights: DLP[Peer Reviews]

Forcepoint DLP vs Netwrix FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Forcepoint DLP and Netwrix.

What is the main difference between Forcepoint DLP and Netwrix?

Forcepoint DLP and Netwrix are both enterprise dlp solutions. Forcepoint DLP enterprise DLP platform with risk-adaptive protection and multi-channel data loss prevention, while Netwrix data security and auditing platform for change tracking, compliance, and user behavior monitoring. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Netwrix better than Forcepoint DLP?

Choose Forcepoint DLP if comprehensive DLP coverage across all exfiltration channels is your priority and large enterprises needing comprehensive DLP enforcement across endpoints, network, cloud, and email with risk-adaptive policy controls. Choose Netwrix if more accessible pricing for mid-market organizations matters most and mid-market organizations needing data auditing, change tracking, and compliance reporting at a lower price point than enterprise platforms.

How much does Netwrix cost compared to Forcepoint DLP?

Netwrix pricing: From $25/user/year / Enterprise custom pricing. Forcepoint DLP pricing: Custom enterprise pricing based on user count. Netwrix's pricing model is per-user subscription, while Forcepoint DLP uses per-user subscription pricing.

Can I migrate from Forcepoint DLP to Netwrix?

Yes, you can migrate from Forcepoint DLP to Netwrix. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.