CyberArk vs SplitSecure -- PAM & Identity Compared
CyberArk vs SplitSecure
CyberArk is the market leader in enterprise privileged access management, offering comprehensive credential vaulting, session management, and identity security. SplitSecure takes a fundamentally different approach, distributing credentials across devices using Shamir Secret Sharing so no single device or vendor ever holds a complete secret. CyberArk suits organisations needing full-featured enterprise PAM, while SplitSecure is purpose-built for the highest-sensitivity accounts where vendor dependency and single points of compromise are unacceptable.
Last updated
The Verdict
CyberArk is the right choice for organisations needing full enterprise PAM coverage across thousands of accounts with session recording, account discovery, and deep identity integration. SplitSecure is the right choice for protecting the 10-20 accounts where a breach means catastrophe, with cryptographic separation of duties and zero vendor dependency that traditional vaults cannot provide. Many regulated financial services organisations are adopting a layered approach, using CyberArk for broad PAM and SplitSecure for their highest-risk credentials.
Used CyberArk or SplitSecure? Share your experience.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Feature | SplitSecure | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Highest-sensitivity account protection | Full enterprise PAM platform |
| Architecture | Distributed Shamir Secret Sharing across devices | Centralised credential vault |
| Vendor Dependency | Zero. Credentials work if SplitSecure goes offline | Requires CyberArk infrastructure |
| Session Recording | Not available | Full session monitoring and recording |
| Account Discovery | Not available | Automated privileged account discovery |
| Separation of Duties | Cryptographically enforced via threshold reconstruction | Policy-based approval workflows |
| Implementation Time | Days | 3-6 months typical |
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Custom enterprise pricing |
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose SplitSecure when:
- +You need zero vendor dependency so credentials work even if the vendor goes offline
- +You handle highest-sensitivity accounts in regulated industries subject to DORA, NYDFS, PCI DSS 4.0, or SOX
- +You need cryptographic separation of duties that cannot be bypassed by admin access or social engineering
- +You want mandatory audit trails that are architecturally impossible to circumvent
- +You want fast deployment without months of professional services
Choose CyberArk when:
- +You need comprehensive enterprise PAM with session recording and account discovery
- +You require broad coverage across thousands of privileged accounts
- +You need deep integration with Active Directory and enterprise identity providers
- +Your compliance requirements demand traditional credential vaulting and rotation
- +You have the budget and dedicated team to manage an enterprise PAM deployment
Other CyberArk Alternatives
Unified privilege management and secure remote access platform
Cloud-ready PAM platform built on Secret Server and privilege management
Unified identity security platform with PAM and governance
Open-source identity-based infrastructure access platform
People-first infrastructure access platform with full audit logging
Open-source identity-based access management for dynamic infrastructure
AI-driven identity governance and administration platform
Affordable full-featured privileged access management solution
Pros & Cons Comparison
SplitSecure
Pros
- +Zero vendor dependency — secrets work if SplitSecure goes down
- +Secrets never leave your environment
- +Architecturally resistant to social engineering and account takeover
- +Built-in compliance for DORA, NYDFS, PCI DSS 4.0, SOX
- +Minimal infrastructure — no vault, no gateway, no cluster
Cons
- –Not designed for CI/CD pipeline secrets
- –Focused on human access, not machine-to-machine
- –Newer platform with smaller market presence
- –Best suited for highest-sensitivity accounts rather than all secrets
CyberArk
Pros
- +Strong PAM solution
- +Comprehensive privilege management
- +Strong compliance and audit capabilities
- +Deep enterprise integration ecosystem
- +Proven in highly regulated industries
Cons
- –Complex deployment and configuration
- –Expensive licensing model
- –Steep learning curve for administrators
- –Legacy architecture in some components
- –Long implementation timelines
CyberArk vs SplitSecure FAQ
Common questions about choosing between CyberArk and SplitSecure.
What is the main difference between CyberArk and SplitSecure?
CyberArk is the market leader in enterprise privileged access management, offering comprehensive credential vaulting, session management, and identity security. SplitSecure takes a fundamentally different approach, distributing credentials across devices using Shamir Secret Sharing so no single device or vendor ever holds a complete secret. CyberArk suits organisations needing full-featured enterprise PAM, while SplitSecure is purpose-built for the highest-sensitivity accounts where vendor dependency and single points of compromise are unacceptable.
Is SplitSecure better than CyberArk?
CyberArk is the right choice for organisations needing full enterprise PAM coverage across thousands of accounts with session recording, account discovery, and deep identity integration. SplitSecure is the right choice for protecting the 10-20 accounts where a breach means catastrophe, with cryptographic separation of duties and zero vendor dependency that traditional vaults cannot provide. Many regulated financial services organisations are adopting a layered approach, using CyberArk for broad PAM and SplitSecure for their highest-risk credentials.
How much does SplitSecure cost compared to CyberArk?
SplitSecure pricing: Contact for pricing. CyberArk pricing: Custom enterprise pricing / From $2/user/month (basic). SplitSecure's pricing model is custom, while CyberArk uses per-user subscription + modules pricing.
Can I migrate from CyberArk to SplitSecure?
Yes, you can migrate from CyberArk to SplitSecure. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.
Related Comparisons & Guides
SplitSecure Alternatives
Distributed secrets management — no vault, no vendor dependency
ComparisonBeyondTrust vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonHashiCorp Boundary vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonManageEngine PAM360 vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonDelinea vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonSailPoint vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonOne Identity vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform
ComparisonTeleport vs CyberArk
Enterprise privileged access management and identity security platform