Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Cisco Firepower -- Firewall & NGFW Compared

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Cisco Firepower

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Cisco Firepower are both firewall & ngfw solutions. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall cloud-optimized next-generation firewall with native multi-cloud deployment and integrated SD-WAN, while Cisco Firepower cisco's next-generation firewall with Talos threat intelligence and deep network infrastructure integration. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Last updated

The Verdict

Choose Barracuda CloudGen Firewall if cloud-native deployment is faster and simpler than most competitors in AWS, Azure, and GCP is your priority and organizations with multi-cloud and hybrid environments that need cloud-native firewall deployment with integrated SD-WAN and centralized management across all form factors. Choose Cisco Firepower if deep integration with Cisco networking infrastructure and ISE for identity-based policies matters most and cisco-centric enterprises that want firewall security deeply integrated with their existing Cisco switching, routing, and SD-WAN infrastructure.

Used Barracuda CloudGen Firewall or Cisco Firepower? Share your experience.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureCisco FirepowerBarracuda CloudGen Firewall
PricingHardware from ~$2,000 (Firepower 1010) to $300,000+ (Firepower 9300) / Threat license, Malware license, URL Filtering license sold separately / Smart Licensing modelHardware from ~$1,200 (F12) to ~$50,000+ (F1000) / Cloud instances from ~$1.00/hr or annual license / Firewall Control Center for centralized management
Pricing ModelAppliance purchase + annual per-feature subscription licensesAppliance purchase or cloud hourly/annual license + subscription
Open SourceNoNo
DeploymentCloud, Self-HostedCloud, Self-Hosted
Best ForCisco-centric enterprises that want firewall security deeply integrated with their existing Cisco switching, routing, and SD-WAN infrastructureOrganizations with multi-cloud and hybrid environments that need cloud-native firewall deployment with integrated SD-WAN and centralized management across all form factors
Native cloud deployment templates for...Not availableSupported
SD-WAN with application-based traffic...Not availableSupported
Advanced Threat Protection with cloud...Not availableSupported

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Cisco Firepower when:

  • +You value deep integration with Cisco networking infrastructure and ISE for identity-based policies
  • +You value talos threat intelligence provides one of the largest commercial threat research teams
  • +You value encrypted Visibility Engine can classify encrypted traffic without full decryption
  • +You want to avoid threat prevention capabilities do not match market leaders in independent testing
  • +You want to avoid smaller market share and less analyst validation than Palo Alto, Fortinet, or Check Point

Choose Barracuda CloudGen Firewall when:

  • +You value cloud-native deployment is faster and simpler than most competitors in AWS, Azure, and GCP
  • +You value integrated SD-WAN with dynamic bandwidth management and application-aware routing
  • +You value firewall Control Center simplifies management across hybrid physical-cloud deployments
  • +You want to avoid firewall Management Center interface is complex and can be unintuitive
  • +You want to avoid historical platform transitions (ASA to Firepower to Secure Firewall) cause confusion

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cisco Firepower

Pros

  • +Deep integration with Cisco networking infrastructure and ISE for identity-based policies
  • +Talos threat intelligence provides one of the largest commercial threat research teams
  • +Encrypted Visibility Engine can classify encrypted traffic without full decryption
  • +Snort 3 IPS engine is highly customizable for security researchers
  • +Broad government and compliance certifications (FIPS, Common Criteria, USGv6)

Cons

  • Firewall Management Center interface is complex and can be unintuitive
  • Historical platform transitions (ASA to Firepower to Secure Firewall) cause confusion
  • Performance can degrade significantly when multiple inspection engines are enabled
  • Licensing complexity rivals or exceeds Palo Alto's subscription model
  • Migration from legacy ASA configurations to FTD can be time-consuming

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Pros

  • +Cloud-native deployment is faster and simpler than most competitors in AWS, Azure, and GCP
  • +Integrated SD-WAN with dynamic bandwidth management and application-aware routing
  • +Firewall Control Center simplifies management across hybrid physical-cloud deployments
  • +Competitive pricing for cloud firewall instances compared to Palo Alto VM-Series
  • +Strong focus on distributed and branch office networking

Cons

  • Threat prevention capabilities do not match market leaders in independent testing
  • Smaller market share and less analyst validation than Palo Alto, Fortinet, or Check Point
  • Hardware appliance performance is limited compared to enterprise competitors
  • Application identification is less granular than Palo Alto's App-ID
  • Integration with third-party security tools is more limited than larger ecosystem players

Sources & References

  1. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  2. Cisco Firepower — Official Website & Documentation[Vendor]
  3. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  4. Cisco Firepower Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
  5. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  6. Cisco Firepower Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
  7. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  8. Cisco Firepower Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
  9. Gartner Magic Quadrant for Network Firewalls 2024[Analyst Report]
  10. Forrester Wave: Enterprise Firewalls, Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
  11. Gartner Peer Insights: Network Firewalls[Peer Reviews]

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Cisco Firepower FAQ

Common questions about choosing between Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Cisco Firepower.

What is the main difference between Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Cisco Firepower?

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Cisco Firepower are both firewall & ngfw solutions. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall cloud-optimized next-generation firewall with native multi-cloud deployment and integrated SD-WAN, while Cisco Firepower cisco's next-generation firewall with Talos threat intelligence and deep network infrastructure integration. The best choice depends on your organization's size, technical requirements, and budget.

Is Cisco Firepower better than Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?

Choose Barracuda CloudGen Firewall if cloud-native deployment is faster and simpler than most competitors in AWS, Azure, and GCP is your priority and organizations with multi-cloud and hybrid environments that need cloud-native firewall deployment with integrated SD-WAN and centralized management across all form factors. Choose Cisco Firepower if deep integration with Cisco networking infrastructure and ISE for identity-based policies matters most and cisco-centric enterprises that want firewall security deeply integrated with their existing Cisco switching, routing, and SD-WAN infrastructure.

How much does Cisco Firepower cost compared to Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?

Cisco Firepower pricing: Hardware from ~$2,000 (Firepower 1010) to $300,000+ (Firepower 9300) / Threat license, Malware license, URL Filtering license sold separately / Smart Licensing model. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pricing: Hardware from ~$1,200 (F12) to ~$50,000+ (F1000) / Cloud instances from ~$1.00/hr or annual license / Firewall Control Center for centralized management. Cisco Firepower's pricing model is appliance purchase + annual per-feature subscription licenses, while Barracuda CloudGen Firewall uses appliance purchase or cloud hourly/annual license + subscription pricing.

Can I migrate from Barracuda CloudGen Firewall to Cisco Firepower?

Yes, you can migrate from Barracuda CloudGen Firewall to Cisco Firepower. The migration process depends on your specific setup and the features you use. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate automated migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during the transition to ensure zero downtime.