authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID -- Open Source IAM Compared
authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID (2026)
authentik (open source iam) and Microsoft Entra ID (identity & access management) are cybersecurity tools that serve different segments of the market. authentik is self-hosted with open source + enterprise pricing and is best suited for teams wanting a modern, developer-friendly open-source identity provider with easy deployment. Microsoft Entra ID offers cloud-hosted with per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses) pricing and targets organizations already committed to microsoft 365 and azure.
Last updated
The Verdict
authentik has an advantage for budget-conscious teams as an open-source option, while Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial product with per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses) pricing. authentik supports self-hosted deployment for organizations that need full infrastructure control, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.
Tried authentik or Microsoft Entra ID? Drop a quick rating.
authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID at a Glance
| authentik | Microsoft Entra ID | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Open Source IAM | Identity & Access Management |
| Pricing | Free (Open Source) / Enterprise from contact | Free tier with M365; P1 $6/user/mo; P2 $9/user/mo |
| Pricing Model | Open Source + Enterprise | Per-user (bundled with Microsoft licenses) |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Cloud Hosted | No | Yes |
| Self-Hosted | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| Rating | — | 4.1/5 |
Feature Comparison
Key capabilities of authentik and Microsoft Entra ID compared side by side.
authentik
- +SAML, OAuth2, OpenID Connect support
- +LDAP and RADIUS provider
- +SCIM provisioning
- +Multi-factor authentication
- +User self-service portal
- +Application proxy with forward auth
- +Policy engine with flows
- +Customizable login flows
Microsoft Entra ID
- +SSO to 3,000+ SaaS applications
- +Conditional Access with risk-based policies
- +Multi-factor authentication (push, TOTP, FIDO2)
- +Privileged Identity Management with just-in-time access
- +Identity Protection with ML-based risk scoring
- +Entra Verified ID for decentralized credentials
- +Seamless Azure and Microsoft 365 integration
- +Hybrid sync with on-premises Active Directory
- +Entitlement Management for access packages
- +Entra External ID for customer identity
Key Differentiators
Unique to authentik
- SAML, OAuth2, OpenID Connect support
- LDAP and RADIUS provider
- SCIM provisioning
- User self-service portal
Unique to Microsoft Entra ID
- SSO to 3,000+ SaaS applications
- Conditional Access with risk-based policies
- Privileged Identity Management with just-in-time access
- Identity Protection with ML-based risk scoring
When to Choose Each
Choose authentik if...
- →You need a tool best suited for teams wanting a modern, developer-friendly open-source identity provider with easy deployment
- →You want an open-source solution with full code transparency
- →You require self-hosted deployment for data sovereignty
- →Open Source + Enterprise pricing fits your budget model
Choose Microsoft Entra ID if...
- →You need a tool best suited for organizations already committed to microsoft 365 and azure
- →Per-user (bundled with Microsoft licenses) pricing fits your budget model
Compliance & Certifications
authentik
No certifications listed
Microsoft Entra ID
Pros & Cons Comparison
Microsoft Entra ID
Pros
- +Included free or near-free with most Microsoft 365 plans
- +Deep integration across the Microsoft ecosystem
- +Strong conditional access and identity protection
- +Massive deployment base and long-term stability
Cons
- –Less polished for non-Microsoft SaaS integrations
- –Licensing complexity (P1 vs P2, add-ons, bundled skus)
- –Admin UI is fragmented across multiple Azure portals
- –Ties you deeper into the Microsoft ecosystem
authentik
Pros
- +Fully open source with active development
- +Modern, polished admin UI
- +Supports all major identity protocols
- +Easy Docker/Kubernetes deployment
- +Flexible flow-based authentication engine
Cons
- –Younger project than Keycloak
- –Smaller community and ecosystem
- –Enterprise features require paid license
- –Limited enterprise support options
Other authentik Alternatives
The leading open-source IAM platform, backed by Red Hat
Market-leading cloud IAM with the broadest integration catalog
Developer-first CIAM with best-in-class SDKs and docs
All-in-one directory, SSO, and device management for SMBs
Enterprise-grade IAM with hybrid deployment and strong federation
Mid-market cloud IAM at a lower price point than Okta
Enterprise identity platform with AI-driven orchestration for complex deployments
Sources & References
- authentik (Official Site)[Vendor]
- authentik Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- authentik Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- authentik Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Microsoft Entra ID (Official Site)[Vendor]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on G2[User Reviews]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on TrustRadius[User Reviews]
- Microsoft Entra ID Reviews on PeerSpot[User Reviews]
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- Forrester Wave: Identity-As-A-Service (IDaaS), Q4 2024[Analyst Report]
- KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Access Management 2024[Analyst Report]
- NIST SP 800-63: Digital Identity Guidelines[Government Standard]
- FIDO Alliance: Passwordless Authentication Standards[Industry Standard]
- Gartner Peer Insights: Access Management[Peer Reviews]
authentik vs Microsoft Entra ID FAQ
Common questions about choosing between authentik and Microsoft Entra ID.
What is the main difference between authentik and Microsoft Entra ID?
authentik (open source iam) and Microsoft Entra ID (identity & access management) are cybersecurity tools that serve different segments of the market. authentik is self-hosted with open source + enterprise pricing and is best suited for teams wanting a modern, developer-friendly open-source identity provider with easy deployment. Microsoft Entra ID offers cloud-hosted with per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses) pricing and targets organizations already committed to microsoft 365 and azure.
Is Microsoft Entra ID a good alternative to authentik?
authentik has an advantage for budget-conscious teams as an open-source option, while Microsoft Entra ID is a commercial product with per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses) pricing. authentik supports self-hosted deployment for organizations that need full infrastructure control, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is cloud-only. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your organization's specific requirements, compliance needs, and existing technology stack.
How does Microsoft Entra ID pricing compare to authentik?
authentik pricing: Free (Open Source) / Enterprise from contact (open source + enterprise). Microsoft Entra ID pricing: Free tier with M365; P1 $6/user/mo; P2 $9/user/mo (per-user (bundled with microsoft licenses)). The best option depends on your team size, usage patterns, and whether you need cloud-hosted, self-hosted, or hybrid deployment.
Can I migrate from authentik to Microsoft Entra ID?
Migration from authentik to Microsoft Entra ID is possible and depends on your specific setup. Both platforms offer APIs that can facilitate data migration. Consider running both tools in parallel during transition to ensure continuity. Check each vendor's migration documentation for specific guidance.
Related Comparisons & Guides
Microsoft Entra ID Alternatives
Microsoft's cloud IAM, bundled with M365 and Azure
Comparisonauthentik vs Keycloak
The leading open-source IAM platform, backed by Red Hat
Comparisonauthentik vs Okta Workforce Identity
Market-leading cloud IAM with the broadest integration catalog
Comparisonauthentik vs Auth0
Developer-first CIAM with best-in-class SDKs and docs
Comparisonauthentik vs JumpCloud
All-in-one directory, SSO, and device management for SMBs